Picture
BBB falcon team helmet test
We notice that BBB is more and more developing itself into a brand with a wide portfolio with high quality products. To check this hypothese this cycling friend has testet the topmodel: the Falcon. 
 
Why testing the falcon?
Curious about the reason why cycling cracks like Thomas de Gendt or Johnny Hoogerland are cycling with the Falcon helmet we wanted to test one ourselves. Another reason is that because of the dominancy of Giro helmets every cyclist' head looks the same, and its time for something else.
 
The looks
This shiny white team falcon has been on my head for 2 months, featuring temperature changes from minus 5 to 25 Celsius and landscape changes from the flat polders (minus 10 meters) to the Splugenpass (1908 meter above sea level). First the looks: It looks racey and pretty okay. Maybe less subtile than de giros or less different that the Catlikes, but fresh enough. A nice detail is that an aluminium structure is partially visible on the top of the helm. According to BBB this should enforce the inner cage. The backside of the helmet has a design of sharp fins which give it a dynamic profile.
 
But how does it fit?
Well, it fits pretty good! the backside of the helmet has a handy wheel which can be adjusted easily, also with thick gloves. Your head is supported by thick cushions and I didn't feel any pressure points. My head has an houtline of 56cm; normally I wear a Giro Atmos in size S, which is a little bit to tight (but giro's M is way to big). This BBB in size M fits me like a glove.

Special features?According to BBB the inside has an open air stream structure which allows fresh air to wave through the cushions and your head. Well, this claim isn't easy to test in a quantitative way, but it do seems like my upper head hair is moving into the wind. It's only the top of my head, but it's freshier than inside my Giro. Another special feature is the carbon and aluminium reinforcement for maximum security. unfortenately we didn't crash ;-) so no verdict on this feature
What should be improved?
Till now the remarks are pretty positive, but of course there is still some space for improvement. During my bike trip in Lombardia suddenly the fixation between the round wheel straps and the helmet suddenly let go. It was easy to fix and it only happended one time but it took me five minutes. Also, the helmet could be more stylish by adding some sparkling colours (for the normal version).
 
The verdict of Pieter Booij...
In the end one thing is most important with helmets and that is, besides the security ofcourse,  the comfort. And the comfort is great. Therefore I rate it a premier category (four out of five). If BBB could improve the looks a litte bit more and have a better solution for the fixation of the straps it could have been five out of five. Considering the price the Falcon is a good deal.
 So, well done BBB, you're on  the right track.

The 
price: 149 euro
available in normal and team version
weight: around 270 grams 
features: 23 air vents, aluminium and carbon reinforcement; anti-bacterial and washable cushions
verdict: 4th category; 3th category; 2nd category; 1st category, Hors category
 
 
Picture
For the last 5 years i used the Fizik Arione saddle. I thought it suited me as a cyclist: a longer saddle that made it easy to slightly shift position to the front and back. But after the recommandation in Men's Journal as 'Gear of the Year' (calling it the 'package protector') and  an  impressive 5 star review in Bikeradar.com , I could not resist. Eventhough i thought' i was in a comfortable position i realized i had accepted my lower backpains after riding with the Arione as part of my cyclinglife.  Having an old L4-L5 problem i'd never blamed the saddle or position for it, but this test tought me a lot about comfort and position.

Testing the Romin you need to be open to change the old reverences  given by your old saddle. The first moment testing the Romin Evo was quite odd. You are radically placed on your two sitbones and for the first 15 minutes that doesn't give a very comfortable feeling. Second i missed the presure (pain) in the middle of the saddle, which used to be a indication of power and speed. These two initial cons were rebuttaled by the immediate feeling my legs had more space and freedom to move. That was strange i had expected my wing frex Arione had given me maximal freedom but perhaps it can be explaned by the size of my saddle: after measuring i got the smaller size 130mm.

With this extra moving freedom for my legs i slowly got used to this new saddle, and after 2 months and about 1200 km i can say: I love it and i don't want anything else anymore. After some re-positioning of the saddle i discovered the benifits of the curve-up at the back of the Romin. The scientist say it allows you not to bend your back so much as  you need to with a flatter saddle, and my back really feels it. NO MORE BACKPAIN!!! Last months i cycled twice on my other bike (my Canyon for climbing) and after 40kmy backpain returned. For me the Romin saddle is a delight, after getting used to the pressure on my sitbones. I feel more freedom to move, i sit more tight in the saddle and my back is very happy finally. This saddle delivered more than i ever thought would be possible. 

The only negative to mention on the Romin saddle is that we cannot buy the white or Team version of the Romin Pro of Evo in the Netherlands nor the EU. That is grazy and almost unacceptable after these these two great reviews and my personal experience.  I need an second saddle (team version) for my climbing bike to save my back, but how do i get one?